On social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, an inundation of tweets from Congress party supporters alleges that the Supreme Court of India has severely criticized the Modi government regarding the demonetisation issue. These tweets suggest that the Supreme Court has described demonetization as a strategy used by the government to transform illicit funds into legitimate assets.
Congress party supporter Ankit Mayank said, โBรฉlt trรจatment by Supreme Court to Modi Govt on Demonetisation SC observed that Demonetisation was done in such haste that no due process was followed, hence making it illegal as per law. SC also highlighted that no suggestion, no advice was taken from even the Finance Minister, perhaps even he didnโt know about it. CJI further concluded that ๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป๐น๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฏ๐น๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐บ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ผ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐. Shockwaves to Modi Govt, unexpected SummerSlam right before the Loksabha polls. Thank you CJI, you are the only HOPE.โ
Ashish wrote on X, โDemonetisation was a good way of converting black money into white money: Justice BV Nagarathna. Tight slap of SC to GOI.โ
Rohini Anand wrote, โSupreme Court exposed Modi Govt on Demonetisation completely. Supreme Court observed that no due procedure was followed during Demonetisation & it was done in haste, making it illegal as per law. The SC also highlighted the fact that no suggestion or advice was taken from the Finance Minister or the cabinet. SC concluded that ๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป๐น๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฏ๐น๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐บ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ผ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐. Massive blow to Modi Govt before Loksabha elections, Thank you SC.โ
Ductar Fakir 2.0 wrote, โDemonetisation was a good way of converting black money into white moneyย โ Supreme Courtโ
AmOxicillin FC wrote, โBREAKING NEWS. Supreme Court is hitting against Demonetization left and right, tearing BJP apart into pieces.ย โDemonetisation was a good way of converting black money into white moneyโ -Justice BV Nagarathnaโ
Also Read: Advocate Suryanarayan Who Fought Against Bhagat Singh, Not Associated with RSS
Our investigation started with a Google search utilizing pertinent keywords associated with the subject matter. Subsequently, we stumbled upon an article released by Bar and Bench on March 30th, 2024. As per the article, Supreme Court Justice BV Nagarathna addressed attendees during the inaugural session of the Courts and the Constitution Conference, which was hosted by NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad.
Justice BV Nagarathna said on demonetisation, โI am happy that I got to be part of that bench. We all know what happened on November 8, 2016. 86% of the currency was 500 and 1,000 notes, which I think the Central government lost sight of. Imagine a labourer who had to get his notes exchanged for daily essentials. 98% of the currency came back, so where are we in black money eradication (goal of demonetisation)? So I thought (at the time) it was a good way of making black money white money, of unaccounted cash entering the system. What happened with regard to income tax proceedings thereafter, we do not know. So this common manโs predicament really stirred me and I had to dissent.โ
During her address, Justice BV Nagarathna discussed her dissenting stance regarding the Supreme Courtโs ruling on demonetisation issued in January 2023. Notably, Justice Nagarathna was a member of the five-justice bench that delivered the judgment.
ย According to the Indian Express Article published on January 5, 2023, โA Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court Monday upheld by a 4:1 majority the decision taken by the central government six years ago in 2016 to demonetise currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 denominations. The majority, comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer, B R Gavai, A S Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian, held that the Centreโs notification dated November 8, 2016, was valid and satisfied the test of proportionality. Justice BV Nagarathna in her dissenting view held that though demonetisation was well-intentioned and well thought of, it has to be declared unlawful on legal grounds (and not on the basis of objects).โ
Therefore, Justice BV Nagarathna expressed her dissenting viewpoint on demonetisation during a private event hosted at NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad. She was joined by a few other judges who also addressed the gathering. Itโs important to note that during the event, Justice Nagarathna conveyed her personal opinion rather than representing the entire Supreme Court. It should be noted that in January 2023, the Supreme Court had already upheld the central governmentโs decision on demonetization,ย calling it โvalid and meeting the test of proportionality.โ
Claim | Supreme Court of India said that demonetisation was a method to convert black money into white |
Claimed by | Congress supporters |
Fact Check | Misleading |
This website uses cookies.